 |
 |
Friday, May 26, 2017
Wednesday, May 24, 2017
sports portfolio.
1.
a. -Travis Haughton
b. General focus of portfolio (photoj, sports, stories, etc.)- sports and little kidsc. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - too many back of heads, lots of out of focus, pictures of signsd. List two things the judges like-likes weirdness and different viewse. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like? i thought some of the photos were hard to tell what they main focus was of.
a. Name of photographer - Josh Birnbaum
a. Name of photographer - Sam Adams
b. General focus of portfolio (photoj, sports, stories, etc.)-photo j, sports
c. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - back of heads, needs to come closer to action, titled only
d. List two things the judges like- cool concepts and portraits
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. What did the judges note as strengths as they were critiquing it?
b. What do you see as strengths? Do you see any weaknesses?
a. Briefly describe the process the judges went through in deciding the winner
Part 2:
i liked the picture of a basketball game that was in black and white. it was very different than most basketball photos because one subject was on the ground against another person. I do think that when it comes to editing a picture, that it better to go through each option b/c even though a black&white filter is nice, It just didn't fir in w/ the sport. So do agree w/ them on that.
2. Describe one photo that you do NOT agree with the judges on. Explain why you think the judges are wrong. i disagree with the judges on th first photo on the second video which is of a race car. i liked that is showed how fast the car was moving. they didt think the photo had much going for it. Personally i like pictures like that b/c it bring out the way a photographer know how to use the camera settings and how it bring out the affection in the photograph.
b. General focus of portfolio (photoj, sports, stories, etc.)- sports and public places
c.three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - some pictures did nothing for them, bad transitions, and missed opportunities
d. two things the judges like- likes when person is in the middle of action and pictures taken at the right moment
e. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
i didn't really like these pictures and there wasnt really much of a theme and it was all over the place
e. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
i liked that a lot of pictures had shadows or silhouettes.
the judges noted the good color compositions and that the photographer got to the level of what he was photographing like laying on th floor.
i thought that all the different angles were strengths and that a weakness would be that some were staged photos.
they vetoed ones out one by one
made sure to not put one fore second place
it was either pass or fail
looked for themes
looked at the skills of the editors
1. Describe one photo that you agree with the judges on. Explain why you and the judges do or do not like it. o
a. -Travis Haughton
b. General focus of portfolio (photoj, sports, stories, etc.)- sports and little kidsc. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - too many back of heads, lots of out of focus, pictures of signsd. List two things the judges like-likes weirdness and different viewse. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like? i thought some of the photos were hard to tell what they main focus was of.
a. Name of photographer - Josh Birnbaum
a. Name of photographer - Sam Adams
b. General focus of portfolio (photoj, sports, stories, etc.)-photo j, sports
c. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - back of heads, needs to come closer to action, titled only
d. List two things the judges like- cool concepts and portraits
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. What did the judges note as strengths as they were critiquing it?
b. What do you see as strengths? Do you see any weaknesses?
a. Briefly describe the process the judges went through in deciding the winner
Part 2:
i liked the picture of a basketball game that was in black and white. it was very different than most basketball photos because one subject was on the ground against another person. I do think that when it comes to editing a picture, that it better to go through each option b/c even though a black&white filter is nice, It just didn't fir in w/ the sport. So do agree w/ them on that.
2. Describe one photo that you do NOT agree with the judges on. Explain why you think the judges are wrong. i disagree with the judges on th first photo on the second video which is of a race car. i liked that is showed how fast the car was moving. they didt think the photo had much going for it. Personally i like pictures like that b/c it bring out the way a photographer know how to use the camera settings and how it bring out the affection in the photograph.
b. General focus of portfolio (photoj, sports, stories, etc.)- sports and public places
c.three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - some pictures did nothing for them, bad transitions, and missed opportunities
d. two things the judges like- likes when person is in the middle of action and pictures taken at the right moment
e. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
i didn't really like these pictures and there wasnt really much of a theme and it was all over the place
e. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
i liked that a lot of pictures had shadows or silhouettes.
the judges noted the good color compositions and that the photographer got to the level of what he was photographing like laying on th floor.
i thought that all the different angles were strengths and that a weakness would be that some were staged photos.
they vetoed ones out one by one
made sure to not put one fore second place
it was either pass or fail
looked for themes
looked at the skills of the editors
1. Describe one photo that you agree with the judges on. Explain why you and the judges do or do not like it. o
Opinion preview assignment.
1. Who wrote the story?
editorial
2. What is their story about?
immigration
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
they believe that we should be welcome to everyone and not say things like build the wall and accept everyone
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
no, but they talked about how people who want to build the wall
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
their opinion was stated and it stayed consistent
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
3rd
1. Who wrote the story?
reagan wallace
2. What is their story about?
the secretary of education
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
she believes that betsy is not fit for the position
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
no
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
no she thinks she isn't fit for the position
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
3rd
1. Who wrote the story?
ian miller
2. What is their story about?
saving the tree
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
they wanted to save the bowie tree
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
how its expensive
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
no they stuck to the opinion
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
3rd
1. Who wrote the story?
jake brien
2. What is their story about?
colleges
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
that its harder to get into collages now
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
no
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
no they talked about hard work
6. Are there any quotes in the story?
no
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
3rd
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)